Too often in our professional interactions, the term “defect” is used loosely — frequently to describe any indication or anomaly detected during an inspection or examination. In nondestructive testing (NDT), there is a structured process to qualify an anomaly before it can truly be called a defect. Here it is presented aiming to promote the use of technical terms correctly.
Using the correct terminology is not just semantics — it impacts engineering decisions, inspection reports, and even asset integrity strategies. But more importantly, professional image.
Here is a key question: Do you follow a defined process before labeling something as a defect? Which term do you use — and when?
Thanks so much for visiting!
